It’s hope-inspiring that a bipartisan bill was introduced in the House of Representatives in January that could save our children and grandchildren from what scientists tell us is an ongoing and growing climate disaster.
The evidence is incontrovertible that the climate is in crisis and that burning fossil fuels is the primary cause. Recognized global authorities on climate change warn that there is precious little time left — just 12 years — to drastically reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions enough to avert the worst effects of climate change. By putting a price on carbon emissions, the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act of 2019 (H.R.763) shines a spotlight directly on the hidden costs of burning fossil fuels, and very swiftly reins in GHG emissions.
How would H.R.763 work?
Here’s how the bill would work and be a win-win both for the public and for industry. A steadily rising fee is placed on the carbon content of fossil fuels — coal, oil and natural gas — when they enter the economy. It starts low ($15/ton of CO2-equivalent emissions) and increases yearly by $10/ton until GHG emissions are reduced by 90 percent. The predictable increases in fossil energy prices stimulate the market-driven innovation needed to transition to renewable energy sources, all without government intervention: no subsidies and no new rules and regulations.
Consumers are protected from the expected rise in the cost of fossil fuel-based energy by requiring the return to U.S. residents (adults and children) of all the money collected — in monthly carbon dividend checks. Because rich and poor receive the same dividends, the majority of low and middle-income families will actually break even or come out ahead, and everyone is free to spend the dividends as they please. What’s more, because carbon pricing isn’t a tax, politicians on both sides of the aisle can support it.
H.R.763 is an American-led global response to climate change. The bill imposes a carbon border fee on imported goods from nations which fail to impose some form of a price on GHG emissions. In addition to nudging other nations to follow suit, the border tariff enhances the competitiveness of American firms that are more energy-efficient than their global competitors. It also discourages American business from relocating to places where they can pollute more.
Predicted results of H.R.763
H.R.763 promises to reduce 2016 carbon dioxide emissions by 40 percent in 2030 and by 90 percent in 2050, according to a widely respected economic modeling firm. In 20 years, national employment should grow by close to three million jobs and over 200,000 American lives would be saved by the reduction in air pollution. The cost of health care would fall as we move away from highly polluting fossil fuels, which sicken many, especially the very young and old.
Support for H.R.763
There is widespread agreement among economists, Democratic and Republican, that pricing carbon and returning the money to consumers is the most cost-effective solution to the climate crisis. H.R.763 has already earned the backing of major organizations, including the Presbyterian and Episcopalian Churches, U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, Young Evangelicals for Climate Action, Nature Conservancy, Environmental Defense Fund and Evangelical Environmental Network.
What you can do!
It is widely believed that a carbon-pricing bill will eventually pass — the only question is when. It’s up to the public to let Congress know we want action to combat the climate crisis right now. Please contact your Member of Congress (and others) and ask them to sponsor H.R.763. And start talking to your family, friends and neighbors about the climate crisis and the importance of getting Congress to act now.
Latest posts by Sarah Mosko, PH.D. (see all)
- Finally, a Bill in Congress to Address Climate Crisis - April 3, 2019
- Science, Technology, and Environment: No More Kicking the Climate Crisis Down the Road - December 13, 2018
- Science, Technology, and Environment: Holding Rep. Mimi Walters Accountable - April 1, 2018